![]() 52esr? Not so much! I can’t think of a single parameter where 52esr is better than v55, not one. ![]() ![]() “I just configured my FF 58 and 52 ESR manually and it works better than Waterfox.”Īnyone that has used Nightly recently will agree that Nighlty performs better than WF And FF. When you consider the army of devs (sarcasm) working on Waterfox I think ‘they’ are doing a fine job. Especially when I compare that to a so-called ‘security’ company who proclaims to be a leader in their field take multiple weeks to update their version of the chromium browser. I wouldn’t consider that anywhere close to an excessive amount of time. 4) to incorporate the security patch along with some other changes. So…what am I missing?!? It took the Waterfox dev one week (Oct. Since then 52.4.1 and 56.0.1 were released but those were bug releases not security updates. Just out of curiosity, what am I missing here? 10 days ago Waterfox was updated to include the security updates from FF v52.4esr and FF v56. Even though pingsender was already silenced on my users are browsing voluntarily with 1 critical and 6 high Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures? Way to make a point.” Martin helps those who still care to make Firefox a better place, so thanks for the article. ![]() I’m glad when those who “cry” as you say are gone to Chrome and stop bombarding these articles with their fake news how bad Firefox is when Firefox is still the best browser. ![]() People who are dinosaurs and upset or lazy creating drama. >”many users’ cries and tears by throwing their legacy add-ons to the garbage”ġ) Mozilla says a lot users use no extensionsĢ) there are lists for migration, which webextension replaces what legacy addonģ) so far I could find replacements for 19 out of 20 addons I have ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |